Inside Trumps Effort to Take Over the Midterm Elections
In mid-December 2020, federal officials responsible for protecting American elections from fraud converged in a windowless, dim, fortified room at the Justice Departments downtown Washington, D.C., headquarters.They had been summoned by Attorney General William Barr.Over the preceding weeks, Donald Trumps claims that the presidential election had been stolen from him had reached a crescendo. Hed become obsessed with a conspiracy theory that voting machines in Antrim County, Michigan, had switched votes from him to Joe Biden.With each day, Trump ratcheted up the pressure to unleash the might of the federal government to undo his defeat.Barr interrogated experts from the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, crammed in beside top FBI officials around a cheap table. He needed the group of around 10 to answer a crucial question: Was it really possible the 2020 presidential vote had been hacked?ProPublicas description of the previously unreported meeting comes from several people who were in the room or were briefed on the gathering. Everyone understood that the meeting represented an important moment for the nation, they said. Barr, who did not respond to requests for comment, had walked a delicate line with Trump, instructing the FBI to investigate allegations of election irregularities while declaring publicly there had been no evidence to date of widespread fraud.The nonpartisan specialists from CISA, backed by their FBI counterparts, explained theyd unravelled what had happened in Antrim County. A clerk had made a mistake when updating ballot styles on machines, leading to a software problem that initially transferred votes from Republicans to Democrats, they said. There was no fraud, just human error which would soon be publicly confirmed through a hand count of the countys ballots.Animation by Matt Rota and Henrike LendowskiListening intently, Barr seemed to understand both the truth and that telling it to the president would almost certainly cost him his job.At the end of the meeting, Barr turned to his top deputy, made hand motions as if he was tying on a bandana and said he was going to kamikaze into the White House.What happened next is well known. When Barr met with Trump in the Oval Office on Dec. 14, the president launched into a monologue about how the events in Antrim County were absolute proof that the election had been stolen. Barr waited to get a word in edgewise before telling his boss what the experts from CISA had told him.Do you have information you can share about federal officials working on elections or any of the individuals in this article? Reporter Doug Bock Clark can be reached at doug.clark@propublica.org and on Signal at 678-243-0784. Reporter Jen Fifield can be reached at jen.fifield@propublica.org and on Signal at 480-476-0108. If youre concerned about confidentiality, check out our advice on the most secure ways to share tips.Then Barr offered his resignation letter, which Trump accepted. Barr left believing hed done his part to preserve democratic norms.I was saddened, Barr wrote of Trump in his memoir. If he actually believed this stuff he had become significantly detached from reality.Barr was one of many federal officials most of them Trump appointees who refused to bend to the presidents demands, which only intensified after Barr was gone. Although rioters inspired by Trump managed to delay the certification of his defeat by storming the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, ultimately the institutional guardrails of American democracy held barely.But if faced with the same tests today, the guardrails and people that held the line would largely be missing, an examination by ProPublica found.ProPublica scrutinized what happened the last time Trump lost a national election. Some of that happened in plain sight: After a cascade of defeats in court, Trump began pressuring state and local officials to overturn the results. But more happened behind the scenes, like the meeting that helped persuade Barr to hold the line.Our reporting uncovered previously undisclosed aspects of a federal effort to safeguard the results of the 2020 vote, which involved at least 75 people across several agencies. Today, nearly all of those people are gone, having resigned, been fired or been reassigned, particularly in the departments of Justice and Homeland Security. That included the cybersecurity specialists who had established that the Antrim County allegations were false and reported their findings to Barr.The people we identified as resisting attempts to overturn the 2020 results have been replaced by roughly two dozen people Trump has installed in positions that could affect elections. Ten of them actively worked to reverse the 2020 vote, and the rest are associates of such people. In some cases, ProPublica found, officials have been hired from activist groups that are pillars of the election denial movement. Experts warn that shows the movement has merged with the federal government.These new officials could influence how Trump reacts to the upcoming midterms as polling shows Republicans are approaching what could be a significant electoral loss, with the presidents approval rating nearing record lows, and public concern growing about the weak economy, the administrations mass deportation effort and the war on Iran. Seemingly in preparation to head off such a blow, Trump has stepped up his efforts to nationalize the 2026 elections, saying that Republicans need to take over the midterms. Democrats who monitored Trumps attempts to block his 2020 loss have begun to question whether he will allow a blue wave, particularly if it flips control of a House of Representatives that impeached him twice in his first term.ProPublicas examination reveals new details on how the president has unleashed his loyalists to transform elections. This includes the background of this years FBI raid in Georgia to seize 2020 election materials and how they are using federal resources to search for noncitizens voting. Ultimately, ProPublicas reporting shows how thoroughly and expansively the Trump administration has overhauled the federal government into what some fear is a vehicle for making sure elections go his way.ProPublicas reporting is based on interviews with roughly 30 current or former executive branch officials familiar with the work of Trump loyalists installed in election roles. Most spoke on condition of anonymity because they fear retribution, including those knowledgeable about the December 2020 Barr meeting.The Trump administration maintains its actions will make U.S. elections fairer and more secure and keep those prohibited from voting, such as noncitizens, from doing so.Election integrity has always been a top priority for President Trump, White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson said in a statement. The President will do everything in his power to defend the safety and security of American elections and to ensure that only American citizens are voting in them.Spokespeople for the DOJ and DHS emphasized that their departments are focused on ensuring elections are free and fair, and that they are working closely with the states to achieve those goals. Contentions to the contrary, they say, are false.A few guardrails have endured, preventing Trump from fully realizing his agenda for elections. Judges have blocked key parts of a March 2025 executive order in which Trump attempted to exert greater federal control over aspects of voting, and some Republican state officials have fought back against Justice Department lawsuits demanding state voter rolls.Late last month, Trump issued another executive order on elections that attempts to exert unparalleled federal control over mail-in voting and voter eligibility, which Democrats and voting rights groups are challenging in court.Experts say 2026 will serve as an unprecedented stress test of the integrity of American elections.Our election system withstood Trumps attacks following the 2020 election, said Sen. Alex Padilla, a California Democrat who has led the pushback to the administrations actions on elections, but this will be an even tougher test, with more election deniers having access to federal power than ever before.Animation by Matt Rota and Henrike LendowskiThe DismantlingBarr has said that in the high-stakes days following the 2020 election, he felt like he was playing Whac-A-Mole with Trumps avalanche of false election claims.The investigators at DHS Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency supplied intelligence that disproved many of them, not just those involving Antrim County.CISA was created by Trump in his first term to counter cyber threats in the aftermath of Russias efforts to influence the 2016 vote. It soon came to provide crucial expertise and support to thousands of local election officials grappling with increasingly sophisticated attacks.After the 2020 election, it also played a crucial part in puncturing fallacies spread by Trump supporters, producing a Rumor Control website to rebut them. And it partnered with state officials and technology vendors to release a statement calling the election the most secure in American history. Trump swiftly fired Chris Krebs, whom he had appointed to lead CISA, but Krebs defense of the elections soundness reverberated widely in the media and on Capitol Hill.Among Trumps first actions upon returning to the Oval Office was eviscerating CISA.Starting in February 2025, DHS leadership put employees focused on countering disinformation and helping safeguard elections on leave. The leadership also froze the agencys other election security work, which included assessing local election offices for physical and cybersecurity risks, and disseminating sensitive intelligence information on threats. Eventually, all three dozen or so CISA employees specializing in elections were fired or transferred to work in other areas.It took years of dedicated, bipartisan, cross-sector partnership to build the security infrastructure weve had, and dismantling CISA leaves a gaping hole, said Kathy Boockvar, an elections security expert who served as Pennsylvanias secretary of state from 2019 to 2021. We are making the job of securing our democracy exponentially harder.A DHS spokesperson told ProPublica that the changes at CISA were in response to a ballooning budget concealing a dangerous departure from its statutory mission, which included electioneering instead of defending Americas critical infrastructure. The spokesperson said that CISAs mission is still to coordinate protection of critical infrastructure, including by supporting local partners against cyber threats.It isnt just CISA thats been gutted.The Trump administration has discarded or diminished other federal initiatives with roles in protecting election integrity or blocking foreign interference. While many of these actions have been reported, together they reveal the full sweep of the changes.First, the administration got rid of the National Security Councils election security group, which convened departmental leaders to coordinate federal actions related to voting. Then in August, the administration dismantled the Foreign Malign Influence Center, a branch of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence that had stymied efforts by Russia, China and Iran to interfere in the 2024 election.A spokesperson for ODNI said the center was redundant and that its functions were folded into other parts of the offices intelligence apparatus in ways that arguably makes our ability to monitor and address threats from foreign adversaries stronger, more efficient and more effective.However, former national security officials, including one who had worked at the center, told ProPublica that its functions had largely ceased. Caitlin Durkovich, who led the NSCs election security work during the Biden administration, said that under Trump the federal government has abandoned its traditional role in preserving election integrity and security.Nearly every program and capability to stop bad actors and support election administrators has been dismantled, she said. Heading into the midterms, this leaves states and localities exposed, without the intelligence support or federal coordination they need to detect and respond to threats in real time precisely when the stakes are highest.The early months of the second Trump administration also brought seismic changes to three parts of federal law enforcement with central roles in elections.Kash Patel, the FBIs new director, dismantled the public corruption team, which had been deployed in previous administrations to help monitor possible criminal activity on Election Day. The Foreign Influence Task Force, which aimed to combat foreign influence in U.S. politics, was also disbanded. (An FBI spokesperson said the bureau remains committed to detecting and countering foreign influence efforts by adversarial nations.)Furthermore, the Justice Department substantially reduced the role of its Public Integrity Section, which had been responsible for making sure the departments inquiries werent improperly influenced by politics.After the 2020 election, senior lawyers in the section warned against having the FBI investigate fraud claims raised by Trump allies, saying that the agencys involvement could damage its reputation and appear motivated by partisanship. In this instance, they were overruled by Barr and his deputies, but former officials said this was a rare case in which their guidance was ignored. The need to directly overrule the unit, they said, made it a roadblock one that no longer exists.A month after Trump returned to the Oval Office, the units top staff resigned when agency leaders directed them to dismiss corruption charges against then-New York City Mayor Eric Adams. More resigned later or were transferred. The 36-person section was reduced to two. The administration no longer mandates that it review politically sensitive cases, according to multiple people familiar with the matter.Another key DOJ office, the Civil Rights Divisions voting section, had enforced federal laws that protect voting rights, particularly those that combat racial discrimination. In December 2020, the assistant attorney general overseeing the Civil Rights Division was one of the many department leaders who said they would resign if Trump promoted Jeffrey Clark, a leader who supported Trumps efforts to overturn the election results, to head the department after Barrs resignation. This mass threat of resignation ultimately led Trump to not promote Clark.But now, nearly all of the sections roughly 30 career lawyers have resigned or been moved. This largely started last spring after Harmeet Dhillon, Trumps assistant attorney general for civil rights, put out a memo saying their mission would shift from ensuring voting rights to enforcing Trumps executive order on elections.The Trump administration then filled the section with conservative lawyers who are now litigating against the lawyers they replaced. At least four of those newly appointed lawyers participated in challenging the 2020 vote or have worked with people who helped Trump try to overturn the 2020 election.Its just a shocking and depressing reversal of the federal governments role in making real the promise of nondiscrimination in voting and racial equality, said Anna Baldwin, an appellate attorney for the Civil Rights Division who resigned last year and is now one of those litigating against the Justice Department in a new role at Campaign Legal Center.The Justice Department didnt respond to specific questions about the dismantling of the Public Integrity Section or the change in mission for the Civil Rights Division.In all, at least 75 career officials whod played important roles in elections work at DHS, DOJ and other departments have left or been fired, ProPublica found.Animation by Matt Rota and Henrike LendowskiTeam AmericaLate last summer, after the Trump administration had forced out most of the career specialists, a small group of political appointees began convening at the Department of Homeland Securitys headquarters.The group which once called itself Team America, according to sources familiar with the matter looked for federal levers it could pull to make Trumps March executive order about elections a reality, an effort that has not been previously reported.They represented the new type of people running the show.Its core members included David Harvilicz, a DHS assistant secretary tasked with overseeing the security of election infrastructure, including voting machines, and three of his top staffers. As ProPublica has reported, Harvilicz had co-founded an AI company with an architect of Trumps claims about Antrim County.Despite the setbacks the executive order had met with in court, there was not a whole lot of discussion or disagreement about acting on the directive from Harvilicz or one of his deputies, said a former federal official who interacted with group members. It was just us saluting to do it.This small group was part of a wider team at DHS, DOJ and the White House seeking to push forward the presidents agenda. Some of Trumps new guard are well known: After the 2020 election, Patel pressured military officials to help investigate a conspiracy theory about voting machines, according to a former Justice Department official. (Patel did not respond to a request for comment but claimed in congressional testimony that he did not recall the event.) Others, like Harvilicz, are more obscure but still wield consequential powers.These newcomers are seeking to carry out Trumps executive orders and are unlikely to push back against his false claims that American elections are rife with fraud.Team America members have echoed or spread such material themselves.Heather Honey, who serves under Harvilicz in a newly created position focused on elections, falsely asserted that there were more ballots cast in Pennsylvania than voters in the 2020 presidential election. Trump cited this claim, which has been traced back to her, while exhorting his followers to march on the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.At least 11 administration appointees, including Honey, have ties to the Election Integrity Network, a conservative grassroots organization seeking to transform American elections. It is led by Cleta Mitchell, a lawyer who tried to help Trump overturn the 2020 election. Gineen Bresso, who holds a top job in the White House counsels office, coordinated with the networks leadership in 2024 as the Republican National Committees election integrity chair, ProPublica has reported. Since moving into government, Honey has maintained close ties to Mitchells organization, and she and at least two other federal officials have given its members private briefings.Experts say these former activists who helped forge a movement built on the idea that the 2020 election was stolen from Trump are seeking to make sure that does not happen again.The election denial movement is now interwoven within the federal government, and they are working together toward a shared goal of reshaping elections in ways that undermine the freedom to vote, said Brendan Fischer, a director at the Campaign Legal Center, a nonpartisan, pro-democracy legal organization. Its not just last-minute slapdash attempts to overturn the results as in 2020, but more systematic efforts to influence how elections are run months ahead of time.In response to questions sent to DHS, Harvilicz and Honey, a DHS spokesperson disputed that they were seeking to use the departments powers to advantage Trump, writing that its employees are focused on keeping our elections safe, secure, and free and working to implement the Presidents policies. In response to questions about their ties to the election denial movement, the spokesperson wrote, To meet the diverse and evolving challenges the Department faces, we hire experts with diverse backgrounds who go through a rigorous vetting process.Mitchell did not respond to detailed questions from ProPublica. The White House answered questions sent to Bresso about her connection to Mitchells network by reiterating its commitment to making American elections secure.Through the fall and winter, as the Justice Department demanded that states turn over confidential voter roll information, Team America worked to solve problems hindering the use of digital tools to comb the lists for noncitizens who had illegally registered to vote. Honey and others ironed out the technical details of merging information from different agencies and crafted data-sharing contracts. When Honey or others hit roadblocks, theyd go to the White House or senior DHS leaders who would come in hot to clear her path, said officials who interacted with them.Initially, the plan was to run voter information obtained by DOJ through a Homeland Security tool called the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements system.More recently, according to two people familiar with the matter, Team America has worked to harness a more powerful tool used by another branch of DHS, Homeland Security Investigations, to increase its ability to search for noncitizen voters and bring criminal charges against them.While DHS told ProPublica that SAVE has identified more than 21,000 potential noncitizens on voter rolls in the past year, officials who have checked those results in detail have found vast inaccuracies, as ProPublica has reported. Most states including those with millions of voters have eventually marked only a few to a few hundred potential noncitizens as registered to vote, and far less have ever voted. The DHS spokesperson also called SAVE secure and reliable.As the election approaches, current and former officials and election security experts expressed concerns that Harvilicz and Honey, whove espoused debunked conspiracy theories about elections, are in positions to control the narrative around the votes soundness.Its hard to debunk false claims coming with the seal of the federal government, said Derek Tisler, counsel and manager with the Brennan Center for Justices elections and government program. I certainly worry what damage that could do to voters confidence.Animation by Matt Rota and Henrike LendowskiRed FlagsPerhaps nothing better reflects the breakdown of the guardrails that thwarted Trumps rashest impulses in 2020 than his creation last fall of a special White House post reinvestigating his loss to Biden.In December 2020, just days after Barr rebuffed Trumps Antrim County claims, lawyers in the White House counsels office helped prevent the president from heeding activists call to essentially declare martial law to seize voting machines. This multihour shouting and cussing match has been called the craziest meeting of the first Trump administration.But the lawyer whom Trump hired in 2025 as his director of election security and integrity, Kurt Olsen, had worked to overturn Trumps loss in court in 2020 and was later sanctioned by judges, including for making baseless allegations about Arizona elections.Olsens work in the second Trump administration has breached the firewall between the White House and DOJ officials, established after Watergate to prevent law enforcement officers from making decisions based on political pressure, said Gary Restaino, a former U.S. attorney in Arizona.This is not a constitutional or even a statutory requirement, Restaino said, but its a democracy requirement to make sure that citizens throughout America understand that decisions about life and liberty are being made in an objective and consistent manner.In a previously unreported series of events, around the end of 2025, Olsen flew to Georgia to meet with Paul Brown, the head of the FBIs Atlanta field office, according to people familiar with the matter.Olsen wanted the FBI to seize 2020 ballots from Fulton County, a Democratic stronghold, and gave Brown a report he claimed would justify the extraordinary action. Brown and his team emphasized to Olsen that any investigation his team did would be independent and fair.When Brown and his team examined the report, they found that Georgias election board had already looked into its allegations, dismissing many altogether, and concluding that others came down to human error, not criminal wrongdoing. The report had been assembled by a longtime ally of Olsens and participant in the Election Integrity Network who had a history of discredited claims, ProPublica has reported.Based on their own investigation, Browns team submitted an affidavit to their superiors at DOJ that did not make a strong enough case to move forward with what Olsen wanted.Soon after, Brown was offered a choice: retire or be moved to a new office, people with knowledge of the exchange told ProPublica.Olsen did not respond to requests for comment.An FBI spokesperson said that Brown elected to retire and that its work in the election security space is entirely consistent with the law.Browns ouster after refusing to carry out the seizure of 2020 election materials has been reported, but Olsens involvement and the details of their interactions leading to Browns retirement have not been previously disclosed.With Brown gone, the case moved ahead under his replacement.Trump administration officials also took another step to keep control of the investigation.Then-Attorney General Pam Bondi chose Thomas Albus, whom Trump had appointed as U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Missouri, to prosecute the case even though it fell far outside his usual regional jurisdiction. Albus had been meeting with Olsen since around the time the White House lawyer was hired, ProPublica has reported. (Albus declined a request for comment.)In late January, the FBI carried out an unprecedented raid in Fulton County and the agencys affidavit, put together by Albus and Browns replacement, cited a version of the report Olsen gave to Brown as evidence supporting the seizure. ProPublica was part of a news coalition that sued to unseal the affidavit.An FBI spokesperson said that its agents followed all procedure to ensure everything was in proper order, and FBI evidence team had the necessary court-authorized search warrant before they arrived on site.Ryan Crosswell, who worked in the Justice Departments Public Integrity Section for around half a decade, handling a number of election cases, called Browns replacement and Albus involvement a red flag because of the unusual circumstances of their appointments.Theyre just moving through people until they find someone whos willing to do exactly what they want, Crosswell said.The Justice Department did not respond to a question about Crosswells comment.The extraordinary raid was also enabled in a previously unreported way by the destruction of the DOJs Public Integrity Section.Multiple former lawyers for the section said they likely would have tried to block the Fulton County investigation because it lacked strong evidence, had a clear political slant and went against department directives that actions should not be taken for the purpose of giving an advantage or disadvantage to any candidate or political party.Crosswell said, Based on everything we know, if PIN was still there, wed say no.John Keller was principal deputy chief of the Public Integrity Section from 2020 to 2025 and was acting chief when he resigned in early 2025. He worries that allegations of irregularities in the upcoming election will be handled on a partisan basis. Without that review and without apolitical, objective, honest brokers involved in the process, there is a much greater risk for intentional manipulation or inadvertent interference, Keller said.Animation by Matt Rota and Henrike LendowskiDismantling the BrainThe week the FBI seized Fulton Countys ballots, about half of the nations secretaries of state converged on Washington, D.C., for their winter conference.They had urgent questions about elections for Bondi, then-DHS Secretary Kristi Noem and other luminaries who had promised to appear at the event. But none of the headline names showed, leaving conference attendees staring at an empty podium, until the session was abruptly canceled.The breakdown was emblematic of a widening chasm between state officials and the parts of the federal government that had, until recently, worked with them to secure American elections.Shenna Bellows, Maines Democratic secretary of state, said in an interview that the trust between the Trump administration and states is absolutely demolished.This loss of trust reflects that election deniers have assumed so many top roles at federal agencies. Honey sometimes represents DHS on cross-departmental conference calls with state election chiefs, an unsettling reality for those who spent years countering the false claims she made from outside the government.On a February call, state officials expressed confusion about whether the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency would still assess their election systems for physical and cyber vulnerabilities. Honey said it would, but Bellows said shed been told it wouldnt.Two DHS officials told ProPublica CISAs remaining staff avoids election work, afraid they could lose their jobs if they engage with state and local officials. In CISA, elections are a toxic poison, one said.A DHS spokesperson said state and federal officials are still working together every single day to protect elections and that The claim that DHS has a broken partnership with states and made our elections less secure is simply false.The cuts to career election specialists and their divisions have eliminated information channels that spotlighted threats as voting took place, including Election Day command posts run by the Justice Department and FBI. Another information channel, which DHS used to fund, will still operate but will be available only to state and local election offices, not the federal government.Jessica Cadigan, a former FBI intelligence analyst who investigated Election Day threats, said FBI headquarters command post was critical to her cases.That is dismantling the brain, if you will, she said. They are the ones that piece the whole thing together.An FBI spokesperson said the agency will still have capabilities to monitor the situation on the ground through designated election crimes coordinator experts in all its field offices.Jena Griswold, Colorados Democratic secretary of state, has come to see the federal government as adversarial to elections and election administration, rather than a partner.Colorado is one of around 30 states the Justice Department has sued for confidential voter roll information. At least four courts that have fully considered those cases so far have dismissed them, although the Justice Department has appealed most of the decisions. (The others are pending.) Griswold told ProPublica she has added another lawyer to her staff to fight whatever comes next from the Trump administration.Donald Trump, she said, has made American elections less safe.The post Inside Trumps Effort to Take Over the Midterm Elections appeared first on ProPublica.
English
Arabic
French
Spanish
Portuguese
Deutsch
Turkish
Dutch
Italiano
Russian
Portuguese (Brazil)
Greek