Design by Sam Donndelinger.Subscribe nowOver the past five years, corporate America has abandoned diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) practices en masse, with the crusade to roll back these efforts only ramping up since Trumps reelection.A key factor fueling these rollbacks is shareholder proposals.Over the last year, Apple, Alphabet, Netflix, JPMorganChase, PayPal, Costco, Goldman Sachs, Berkshire Hathaway, Walmart, Kroger and Coca-Cola have all received proposals to review or report on DEI policies, cut connections with LGBTQ advocacy organizations or cease DEI efforts altogether.While it may seem like there are many forces behind these proposals, they were all submitted by the National Center for Public Policy Research, a conservative think tank commonly referred to as the National Center.Although not very well known, they are effective: Since receiving their proposals, half of the companies listed above have watered down or abandoned their DEI practices, with Apple, JPMorganChase, Costco, Kroger and Coca-Cola standing firm.And although the National Center has been trying to dismantle DEI for nearly two decades, theyre experiencing enormous success today due to the rise of the conservative crusade against woke capitalism and so-called viewpoint discrimination.Jason Stahl, a historian and researcher specializing in right-wing think tanks and populism in the U.S., says the National Centers newfound success reflects a renewed desire for socially conservative populist movements. Think tanks prime themselves to respond to the American political culture in a populist way and to present themselves as for the people.Weve got Flint, Michigan without clean drinking water, weve got the flooding that occurred in Appalachia and North Carolina, weve got the fires in California and in Hawaii. Why arent we talking about all this? he says. Politics should be about the improvement of peoples lives, but dominant powers in the U.S., including the National Center, want people to be fighting over DEIa debate that detracts from the material reality of peoples lives.How the National Center Is so EffectiveThrough shareholder proposals, the National Centeralong with anyone who owns a high enough stake in a publicly traded companycan attempt to influence its governance.In their proposal to Apple, the National Center submitted a Request to Cease DEI Efforts, writing, Apple likely has over 50,000 [employees] who are potentially victims of this type of discrimination. In their proposal to Alphabet, Googles parent company, they came after the Human Rights Campaigns (HRC) Corporate Equality Index (CEI), calling it hyper-partisan, divisive and increasingly radical. Their supporting statement included disinformation about transgender people, claiming the HRC uses the CEI to force [corporations] to do the political bidding of radical activists, which seek to sow gender confusion in youth, encourage permanent surgical procedures on confused and vulnerable teens, and effectively eliminate girls and womens sports and bathrooms.And in their proposal to Goldman Sachs, they requested a Racial Discrimination Audit, citing a Supreme Court case that alleged Harvard University's affirmative action policies discriminated against white students.While the Goldman proposal failed, with just 2% of shares voting in its favor, the company still dropped their diversity and inclusion policies. But even these losses are often considered wins by the National Center, who have said that the true aim of these proposals is to negotiate with companies and convince them to amend their equal employment opportunity policies to add protections against viewpoint discrimination.Subscribe for LGBTQ-focused journalism.R.G. Cravens, a senior research analyst at the Southern Poverty Law Center, says the anti-DEI movement is part of a bigger campaign to maintain the status quo in corporate America. A lot of the rhetoric the hard right uses to describe DEI is based on racist and white supremacist narratives about people of color. For example, saying that DEI means unqualified people get jobs, they mean people of color who arent qualified to hold positions, he says. DEI policies are designed to interrupt systemic inequalities, and they do a lot beyond just what the hard right tends to caricature them as doing.In principle, DEI is meant to close wage and opportunity gaps in the workforce. LGBTQ workers earn 90 cents to every dollar earned by the average American worker, and women make 85 cents to every dollar earned by men. Meanwhile, Black and Latino workers make 24% and 28% less than white workers, respectively. Trans women, who are the most demonized in the crusade against DEI, earn just 60 cents on the dollar compared to the typical American worker.Mary Wrenn, a professor of economics specializing in capitalism and neoliberalism at the University of Cambridge, says the crusade against DEI uses a similar strategy to that used against the civil rights movement of the 1960s. There were a lot of economists and politicians who said that we should not force desegregation because the free market will take care of it. Of course thats not true: We had to have legislation in order for the cultural and social spheres to catch up.Subscribe nowThe National Centers Free Enterprise Project and the Rise of Stefan PadfieldWhile the anti-DEI movement has only gained momentum in the last few years, the National Center has been around since 1982, when Amy Moritz Ridenour, a former campaign coordinator for Ronald Reagan, founded it.In the 1990s, they successfully campaigned against the Clinton healthcare plan that would have provided universal healthcare to all Americans. Throughout the early 2000s, they campaigned to limit the amount that businesses which knowingly sold deadly asbestos products must pay in compensation to victims.One of the National Centers major initiatives is the Free Enterprise Project (FEP). Launched in 2007, they claim the FEP is the original and premier opponent of the woke takeover of American corporate life and defender of true capitalism.Through the years, the FEP has campaigned against attacks on conservatives, pharmaceutical company support for the Affordable Care Act, and government initiatives to cap corporate carbon dioxide emissions.But in recent years, the FEPs focus has been to use shareholder activism to force a shift in corporate America. In 2021, they launched the Stop Corporate Tyranny coalition, which aims to [expose] the Lefts nearly completed takeover of corporate America and provide resources and tools for everyday Americans to fight back against the Lefts woke and censoring mob in the corporate [world].The National Centers funders include anti-LGBTQ hate groups like the Alliance Defending Freedom; religious donor-advised funds like National Christian Foundation; mainstream charitable funds like Fidelity, Schwab and Vanguard Charitable; and corporations such as ExxonMobil.Subscribe for accountability journalism.Free enterprise is just a mask for social conservatism because they want small government, but only with respect to businessthey dont want it with respect to peoples lives, Wrenn told Uncloseted Media. Its about controlling the cultural conversation and our social norms, and thats very tied up with white supremacy, patriarchy and capitalism as an economic means by which to forward their personal agendas, says Wrenn.Stahl says President Trumps positioning as a right-wing populist plays well into the National Centers strategy. Theyre populist projects that say the liberals are out of touch and against your values. Over the decades, the messaging is the same but different issues get plugged in and were seeing this really come to its full flowering because [of] Trump, he told Uncloseted Media.In 2023, Stefan Padfield joined the FEP, quickly becoming the deputy director. The following year, the project convinced the U.S. Court of Appeals to overturn a Nasdaq board diversity rule that had required any Nasdaq-listed companies haveor explain why they dont haveat least two diverse directors, including at least one woman and at least one other person who identifies as an underrepresented minority.Padfield regularly posts transphobic quotes on X. In November, shortly after Trump won the election, he tweeted: The trans insanity, the DEI indoctrination, the gender mutilations of kidsthe moms looked at all that and said hell no! at the polls.Padfield has also penned articles for RealClearMarkets, such as A Question for Goldman Sachs: What Is a Woman? in which he claims, Transgenderism is one of the most divisive issues today, reducing trans women to men who become [women] simply by saying so.In an email to Uncloseted Media, Padfield says he has no disdain for trans people or the wider LGBTQ community. He says he wants to see all people have equal opportunities for maximum flourishing. Having said that, if someone claims, for example, that they need to be permitted to surgically mutilate minors behind the backs of their parents in order to feel affirmed in their belief that children can be born in the wrong body, then I will be on the side of those defending those children.1The Belief That America Should Be Governed as a Christian TheocracyThe National Centers mission is reflective of a larger network of conservatives who claim to be protecting so-called viewpoint diversity. Last year, they launched an app to help shareholders identify conservative proposals that would help hold woke corporations accountable. The app also provided users with neutrality v. wokeness ratings of certain companies.Cravens says that viewpoint discrimination has replaced political correctness as conservative buzzwords. Its this innocuous-sounding phrase like We need to protect First Amendment speech and maintain pluralism [this false notion] that conservatives and people who oppose anti-racist policies and LGBTQ-inclusive policies are discriminated against. But that is so reductionist because it ignores how white people have claimed and maintained power against communities of color through wealth inequality, racist corporate policies and banking practices, he says.He says theres a rhetorical connection shared across these groups that Christian supremacists have been using for decades. You say youre concerned about children and trying to strengthen the familythats a totally different kind of marketing than We are evangelicals and were here to take over. Its been described as a stealth communication strategy to articulate the same message in secular terms in an effort to reach all Americans.What This Means for LGBTQ PeopleThe National Centers successes have a very real impact on LGBTQ communities. I think they risk losing their jobs ultimately, says Cravens. One of the goals is to drive queer people back into a closet and dismantle any notion that its okay to be [openly] queer. They want to turn a group of people toxic so they wont get service, they wont get jobs and they wont be part of society anymore.While powerful institutions try to sow division, advocates say its critical the LGBTQ community works together to push back against organizations like the National Center.Its always been a minefield, says Ben Greene, a transgender inclusion consultant and author of Good Queer News.Greene urges LGBTQ people to stick together. [We] are going to be our best antidote to [DEI setbacks]. You had a bad experience? That needs to go on Glassdoor or your local LGBTQ social media page. It is going to be an increasingly hard time but there is incredible solidarity between the LGBTQ community and other marginalized groups. We cant write off those little moments because that is what will get us out of this, he says.Cravens underscores the need for corporate America to have a backbone to push back against organizations like the National Center in an effort to create fair and inclusive workplaces. A lot of companies advise against anti-DEI shareholder proposals already because they know its irresponsible and unprofitable to try to turn back the clock on civil rights. They should recognize that there is value in diversity and vote down these policies inspired by hateful ideologies.If objective, nonpartisan, rigorous, LGBTQ-focused journalism is important to you, please consider making a tax-deductible donation through our fiscal sponsor, Resource Impact, by clicking this button:Donate to Uncloseted Media1Its inaccurate to characterize gender-affirming care as something that maims or mutilates and this statement gives a misleading impression about the kind of care that medical professionals provide to transgender children.