A Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agent wore Metas AI smart glasses to a June 30 immigration raid outside a Home Depot in Cypress Park, Los Angeles, according to photos and videos of the agent verified by 404 Media.Meta does not have a contract with CBP, and 404 Media was unable to confirm whether or not the agent recorded any video using the smart glasses at the raid. Based on what we know so far, this appears to be a one-off case of an agent either wearing his personal device to an immigration raid, or CBP trying technology on an ad-hoc basis without a formal procurement process. Civil liberties and privacy experts told 404 Media, however, that even on a one-off basis, it signals that law enforcement agents are interested in smart glasses technology and that the wearing of smart glasses in an immigration raid context is highly concerning.Theres a nonzero chance the agent bought the Meta smart glasses because they wanted it for themselves and its the glasses they like to wear. But even if thats the case, its worth pointing out that there are regulatory things that need to be thought through, and this stuff can trickle down to officers on an individual basis, Jake Laperruque, deputy director of the Center for Democracy and Technologys security and surveillance project, told 404 Media. There needs to be compliance with rules and laws even if a technology is not handed out through the department. The questions around [smart glasses are ones] were going to have to grapple with very soon and theyre pretty alarming.The glasses were worn by a CBP agent outside of a Home Depot in Cypress Park, Los Angeles during a June 30 immigration raid which happened amid weeks of protests, the deployment of the National Guard and the Marines, and during which immigration enforcement in Los Angeles has become a flashpoint in the Trump administrations mass deportation campaign and the backlash to it. 404 Media obtained multiple photos and videos of the CBP agent wearing the Meta glasses and verified that the footage and videos were taken outside of the Cypress Park Home Depot during an immigration raid. The agent in the photo is wearing Metas Ray Ban AI glasses, a mask, and a CBP uniform and patch. CBP did not respond to multiple requests for comment. 0:00 /0:15 1 In the video, a CBP agent motions to the person filming the video to back up. The Meta Ray Ban AI glasses are clearly visible on the agents face.Metas AI smart glasses currently feature a camera, live-streaming capabilities, integration with Metas AI assistant, three microphones, and image and scene recognition capabilities through Meta AI. The Information reported that Meta is considering adding facial recognition capabilities to the device, though they do not currently have that functionality. When filming, a recording light on Metas smart glasses turns on; in the photos and brief video 404 Media has seen, the light is not on.Students at Harvard University showed that they can be used in conjunction with off-the-shelf facial recognition tools to identify people in near real time.Do you know anything else about this? I would love to hear from you. Using a non-work device, you can message me securely on Signal at jason.404. Otherwise, send me an email at jason@404media.co.Multiple experts 404 Media spoke to said that these smart glasses qualify as a body worn camera under the Department of Homeland Securitys and Customs and Border Protections video recording policies. CBPs policy states that no personally owned devices may be used in lieu of IDVRS [Incident Driven Video Recording Systems] to record law enforcement encounters, and that recorded data shall not be downloaded or recorded for personal use or posted onto a personally owned device. DHSs policy states the use of personally owned [Body Worn Cameras] or other video, audio, or digital recording devices to record official law enforcement activities is prohibited.Under the Trump administration, however, enforcement of regulations for law enforcement engaging in immigration raids is largely out the window.I think it should be seen in the context of an agency that is really encouraging its agents to actively intimidate and terrorize people. Use of cameras can be seen as part of that, Jay Stanley, a senior policy analyst at the ACLU, told 404 Media. Its in line with the masking that weve seen, and generally behavior thats intended to terrorize people, masking failure to identify themselves, failure to wear clear uniforms, smashing windows, etc. A big part of why this is problematic is the utter lack of policy oversight here. If an agent videotapes themselves engaging in abusive activity, are they going to be able to bury that video? Are they going to be able to turn it on and off on the fly or edit it later? There are all kinds of abuses that can happen with these without regulation and enforcement of those regulations, and the prospects of that happening in this administration seem dim.When reached for comment, a Meta spokesperson asked 404 Media a series of questions about the framing of the article, and stressed that Meta does not have any contract with CBP. They then asked why Meta would be mentioned in the article at all: Im curious if you can explain why it is Meta will be mentioned by name in this piece when in previous 404 reporting regarding ICE facial recognition app and follow up reporting the term smartphones or phone is used despite ICE agents clearly using Apple iPhones and Android devices, they said. Meta ultimately declined to comment for this story.Meta also recently signed a partnership deal with defense contractor Anduril to offer AI, augmented reality, and virtual reality capabilities to the military through Metas Reality Labs division, which also makes the Meta smart glasses (though it is unclear what form this technology will take or what its capabilities will be). Earlier this year, Meta relaxed its content moderation policies on hate speech regarding the dehumanization of immigrants, and last month Metas CTO Andrew Bosworth was named an Army Reserve Lt. Colonel by the Trump administration.Meta has spent the last decade building AI and AR to enable the computing platform of the future, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg said in a press release announcing the deal with Anduril. Were proud to partner with Anduril to help bring these technologies to the American servicemembers that protect our interests at home and abroad.My mission has long been to turn warfighters into technomancers, and the products we are building with Meta do just that, Anduril founder Palmer Luckey said in the press release.In a recent earnings call, Zuckerberg said he believes smart glasses will become the primary way people interact with AI. I think in the future, if you dont have glasses that have AI or some way to interact with AI, I think youre kind of similarly, probably [will] be at a pretty significant cognitive disadvantage compared to other people and who youre working with, or competing against, he said during the call. Thats also going to unlock a lot of value where you can just interact with an AI system throughout the day in this multimodal way. It can see the content around you, it can generate a UI for you, show you information and be helpful.Immigrations and Customs Enforcement has recently gained access to a new facial recognition smartphone app called Mobile Fortify that is connected to several massive government databases, showing that DHS is interested in facial recognition tech.Privacy and civil liberties experts told 404 Media that this broader contextwith Meta heavily marketing its smart glasses while simultaneously getting into military contracting, and the Department of Homeland Security increasingly interested in facial recognitionmeans that seeing a CBP agent wearing Meta AI glasses in the field is alarming.Regardless of whether this was a personal choice by this agent or whether somehow CBP facilitated the use of these meta glasses, the fact that it was worn by this agent is disturbing, Jeramie Scott, senior counsel and director of the Electronic Information Privacy Center told 404 Media. Having this type of technology on a law enforcement agent starts heading toward the tactics of authoritarian governments who love to use facial recognition to try to suppress opposition.The fact is that Meta is at the forefront of popularizing smart glasses, which are not yet a widely adopted technology. The privacy practices and functionality of the glasses is, at the moment, largely being guided by Meta, whereas smartphones are a largely commodified technology at this point. And its clear that this consumer technology that the company markets on billboards as a cool way to record videos for Instagram is seen by some in law enforcement as enticing.Its clear that whatever imaginary boundary there was between consumer surveillance tech and government surveillance tech is now completely erased, Chris Gilliard, co-director of The Critical Internet Studies Institute and author of the forthcoming book Luxury Surveillance, told 404 Media.The fact is when you bring powerful new surveillance capabilities into the marketplace, they can be used for a range of purposes including abusive ones. And that needs to be thought through before you bring things like that into the marketplace, the ACLUs Stanley said.Laperruque, of the CDT, said perhaps we should think about Meta smart glasses in the same way we think about other body cameras: On the one hand, theres a big difference between glasses with a computer built into them and a pair of Oakleys, he said. Theyre not the only ones who make cameras you attach to your body. On the other hand, if thats going to be the comparison, then lets talk about this in the context of companies like Axon and other body-worn cameras.