Massachusetts top court rules Karen Read can be retried in her boyfriends death
apnews.com
2025-02-11T15:12:42Z BOSTON (AP) The states top court ruled Tuesday that Karen Read can be retried on all the same charges in the death of her Boston police officer boyfriend.Prosecutors have sought to retry Read this year on charges of second-degree murder, manslaughter and leaving the scene of a crime. They accused her of ramming into John OKeefe with her SUV and leaving him to die in a snowstorm in January 2022. Reads attorneys argue she was framed to protect other law enforcement officers involved in OKeefes death. A judge declared a mistrial in June after finding jurors couldnt reach an agreement, without polling the jurors to confirm their conclusions. Reads attorney Martin Weinberg argued that five jurors later said they were deadlocked only on the manslaughter count, and had unanimously agreed in the jury room that she wasnt guilty on the charges of second-degree murder and leaving the scene. But they hadnt told the judge. The ruling from the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court clears the way for a new trial on all three charges.The jury clearly stated during deliberations that they had not reached a unanimous verdict on any of the charges and could not do so. Only after being discharged did some individual jurors communicate a different supposed outcome, contradicting their prior notes, the judges wrote. Such posttrial disclosures cannot retroactively alter the trials outcome -- either to acquit or to convict. Weinberg argued in the appeal that trying her again would amount to double jeopardy, and urged the court to allow an a evidentiary hearing where jurors could be asked whether they had reached final not guilty verdicts on any of the charges. Prosecutors maintained theres no basis for dismissing the charges of second-degree murder and leaving the scene. They argued that her lawyers should have sensed a mistrial was inevitable or unavoidable and that they had every opportunity to be heard in the trial courtroom. The judges questioned Weinberg over the the merits for holding an inquiry. Associate Justice Frank Gaziano noted that such inquiries are usually reserved for extraneous information such as racisms in the jury room. Chief Justice Kimberly Budd wondered about the limits of allowing an inquiry, which she suggested could open the door for other defendants to argue a juror came to them to say thats not really what happened.The trial judge, Beverly Cannone, ruled in August that Read could be retried on all three charges. Where there was no verdict announced in open court here, retrial of the defendant does not violate the principle of double jeopardy, Cannone said.Prosecutors said Read, a former adjunct professor at Bentley College, and OKeefe, a 16-year member of the Boston police, had been drinking heavily before she dropped him off at a party at the home of Brian Albert, a fellow Boston officer. They said she hit him with her SUV before driving away. An autopsy found OKeefe had died of hypothermia and blunt force trauma.The defense portrayed Read as the victim, saying OKeefe was actually killed inside Alberts home and then dragged outside. They argued that investigators focused on Read because she was a convenient outsider who saved them from having to consider law enforcement officers as suspects. MICHAEL CASEY Casey writes about the environment, housing and inequality for The Associated Press. He lives in Boston. twitter mailto
0 Kommentare ·0 Anteile ·95 Ansichten ·0 Vorschau