The energy giant has been weakened by years of mishaps and poor decisions, leading to rumors of a takeover that may not subside.

Jordan Clarkson is expected to sign with the Knicks after he clears free agency waivers, sources said Monday.

Wilyer Abreu hit a grand slam and an inside-the-park solo home run for the Boston Red Sox on Monday, in a rousing 13-6 victory over the Cincinnati Reds at Fenway Park, and according to ESPN Research, he's the first player to pull off the feat since 1958.

Inter captain Lautaro Martnez sharply criticized his team's lack of commitment and performance after the 2-0 loss against Fluminense in the Club World Cup round of 16.

Kylian Mbapp is close to making his FIFA Club World Cup debut in Real Madrid's round of 16 clash against Juventus at the Club World Cup, with coach Xabi Alonso saying it is a "big possibility" that the forward will be fit to play.

In the great dance between the two rivals, its getting harder to tell which of them is leading and which is following.

Prime Minister Mark Carney will meet his pledge to eliminate the countrys internal trade barriers by July 1. But economists say its not a substitute for lost U.S. trade.

Pep Guardiola and Co. will have much to ponder ahead of the Premier League season after underdogs Al Hilal sensationally knocked Man City out of the Club World Cup.

The Hawks are acquiring Nickeil Alexander-Walker from the Timberwolves via a sign-and-trade for four years and $62 million, sources told ESPN's Shams Charania on Monday. In addition, Atlanta reached a one-year, $11 million deal with Luke Kennard.

Sergej Milinkovic-Savic has hit back at detractors of Saudi Arabian football following Al Hilal's upset against Manchester City in the Club World Cup.

Paetongtarn Shinawatra is accused of ethical lapses in a conversation with the Cambodian leader Hun Sen and has faced calls to resign.

Arsenal could make a move for Crystal Palace forward Eberechi Eze. Transfer Talk has the latest news, gossip and rumors.

by Kavitha Surana, Lizzie Presser and Andrea Suozzo ProPublica is a nonprofit newsroom that investigates abuses of power. Sign up to receive our biggest stories as soon as theyre published. Before states banned abortion, one of the gravest outcomes of early miscarriage could easily be avoided: Doctors could offer a dilation and curettage procedure, which quickly empties the uterus and allows it to close, protecting against a life-threatening hemorrhage. But because the procedures, known as D&Cs, are also used to end pregnancies, they have gotten tangled up in state legislation that restricts abortion. Reports now abound of doctors hesitating to provide them and women who are bleeding heavily being discharged from emergency rooms without care, only to return in such dire condition that they need blood transfusions to survive. As ProPublica reported last year, one woman died of hemorrhage after 10 hours in a Houston hospital that didnt perform the procedure.Now, a new ProPublica data analysis adds empirical weight to the mounting evidence that abortion bans have made the common experience of miscarriage which occurs in up to 30% of pregnancies far more dangerous. It is based on hospital discharge data from Texas, the largest state to ban abortion, and captures emergency department visits from 2017 to 2023, the most recent year available.After Texas made performing abortions a felony in August 2022, ProPublica found, the number of blood transfusions during emergency room visits for first-trimester miscarriage shot up by 54%.The number of emergency room visits for early miscarriage also rose, by 25%, compared with the three years before the COVID-19 pandemic a sign that women who didnt receive D&Cs initially may be returning to hospitals in worse condition, more than a dozen experts told ProPublica. While that phenomenon cant be confirmed by the discharge data, which tracks visits rather than individuals, doctors and researchers who reviewed ProPublicas findings say these spikes, along with the stories patients have shared, paint a troubling picture of the harm that results from unnecessary delays in care.This is striking, said Dr. Elliott Main, a hemorrhage expert and former medical director for the California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative. The trend is very clear. Blood Transfusions in First-trimester Pregnancy Loss ER Visits Spiked After Texas Banned Abortion After the states first abortion ban went into effect in September 2021, blood transfusions increased. After abortion became a felony in August 2022, they increased more. Note: For emergency department visits involving a pregnancy loss at less than 13 weeks gestation, or with an unknown gestational week. The data mirrors a sharp rise in cases of sepsis a life-threatening reaction to infection ProPublica previously identified during second-trimester miscarriage in Texas. Blood loss is expected during early miscarriage, which usually ends without complication. Some cases, however, can turn deadly very quickly. Main said ProPublicas analysis suggested to him that physicians are sitting on nonviable pregnancies longer and longer before theyre doing a D&C until patients are really bleeding.Thats what happened to Sarah De Pablos Velez in Austin last summer. As she was miscarrying and bleeding profusely, she said physicians didnt explain that she had options for care. Sent home from the emergency room without a D&C two times, she ultimately needed blood transfusions so that she wouldnt die, according to medical records. What happened to me was just so wrong, she told ProPublica. "Doctors need to be providing care to pregnant women that needs to be a baseline. Sarah De Pablos Velez was sent home from an emergency room while bleeding profusely during a miscarriage last year; she ultimately needed blood transfusions to save her life. (Ilana Panich-Linsman for ProPublica) After ProPublica exposed preventable deaths following delays in care, the Texas Legislature passed a bill this year to clarify that doctors can provide abortions when a patient is facing a life-threatening emergency, even if it is not imminent. But many Texas doctors say the reform does not address the difficulty of treating women experiencing early miscarriages, which almost always involve blood loss; they say its hard to know when the expected bleeding might evolve into a life-threatening emergency one that could have been prevented with a D&C. Women can bleed and remain stable for a long time, until they crash. Texas forbids abortion at all stages of pregnancy even before there is cardiac activity or a visible embryo. And while the law allows doctors to remove a dead, unborn child, it can be difficult to determine what that means during early miscarriage, when an array of factors can signal that a pregnancy is not progressing. An embryo might fail to develop. Cardiac activity may not emerge when it should. Hormone levels might dip or bleeding might increase. Even if a doctor strongly suspects a miscarriage is underway, it can take weeks to conclusively document that a pregnancy has ended, and all the while, a patient might be losing blood. Some OB-GYNs and emergency room physicians have long been advising patients to complete their miscarriage at home, especially at Catholic hospitals, even if that is not the standard of care. But now, physicians across the state are faced with a law that threatens up to 99 years in prison, and more are making a new calculus around whether to intervene or even tell patients they are likely miscarrying, said Dr. Anitra Beasley, an OB-GYN in Houston. What ends up happening is patients have to present multiple times before a diagnosis can be made, she added, and some of those patients wind up needing blood transfusions. While they can be lifesaving, transfusions do not stop the bleeding, experts told ProPublica, and they can introduce complications, such as severe allergic reactions, autoimmune disorders or, in rare events, blood cancer. The dangers of hemorrhage are far greater, from organ failure to kidney damage to loss of sensation in the fingers and toes. Theres a finite amount of blood, said Dr. Sarah Prager, a professor of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of Washington. And when it all comes out, youre dead. ProPublicas findings about the rise in blood transfusions make clear that women who experience early miscarriages in abortion ban states are living in a more dangerous medical climate than many believe, said Amanda Nagle, a doctoral student investigating the same blood transfusion data for a forthcoming paper in the American Journal of Public Health. If people are seeking care at an emergency department, Nagle said, there are serious health risks to delaying that care.Waiting for CertaintyIn some clinics and hospitals across Texas, the pressure to definitively diagnose a miscarriage has led to delays in offering D&Cs. Considering the chance of criminal prosecution, some doctors now default to what many pregnancy loss experts view as an overly cautious method for diagnosing miscarriage: ultrasound images alone, using criteria from the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound. Relying only on images to diagnose and discounting other factors, like lab results or clinical symptoms can take days or even weeks. Dr. Gabrielle Taper was a resident at a Catholic hospital in Austin when the ban was enacted, and a culture of fear took hold among her colleagues, she told ProPublica. We started asking, Are we certain that we can document that weve met the radiology guidelines? as opposed to just treating the patient in front of us, she said. If they couldnt show that the likely miscarriage met the criteria, they often felt they had to discharge patients without offering a D&C. People are already in distress, and you are giving them confusion, a false sense of hope, she told ProPublica. Having to send a patient home knowing they may bleed so much they would need a blood transfusion when I know there are procedures I could do or medicine I could offer is just excruciating. The hospital where she worked did not respond to ProPublicas request for comment.The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists does not recommend this approach, advising doctors instead to review the ultrasound as one piece of information among many and counsel patients on all their options. The Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound said that the guidelines are not meant to apply in the setting of a life-threatening situation, such as heavy bleeding, but did not respond to a question about whether it agreed with ACOG that doctors should use a combination of ultrasound images and clinical judgment to assess a pregnancy loss. Dr. Courtney A. Schreiber, an obstetrics and gynecology professor and expert in early pregnancy care, said that even if a patient wants to let a likely miscarriage complete at home, the medical team should still explain different management options, including medication to speed up the process or a D&C, should symptoms like bleeding get worse. Its our obligation to share information, help manage expectations and keep women safe, she said. What happened to Porsha Ngumezi shows how dangerous it can be to delay care, according to more than a dozen doctors who previously reviewed a detailed summary of her case for ProPublica. When the mother of two showed up bleeding at Houston Methodist Sugar Land in June 2023, at 11 weeks pregnant, her sonogram suggested an ongoing miscarriage was likely, her doctor noted. She had no previous ultrasounds to compare it with, and the radiologist did not locate an embryo or fetus which Ngumezi said she thought she had passed in a toilet; her doctors did not make a definitive diagnosis, calling it a pregnancy of unknown location. After hours bleeding, passing clots the size of grapefruit, according to a nurses notes, she received two blood transfusions a short-term remedy. But she did not get a procedure to empty her uterus, which medical experts agree is the most effective way to stop the bleeding. Hours later, she died of hemorrhage, leaving behind her husband and young sons. Hope Ngumezi holds a photograph of him and his late wife, Porsha, who died in a Houston hospital during a miscarriage in June 2023. (Danielle Villasana for ProPublica) Doctors and nurses involved in Ngumezis care did not respond to multiple requests for comment for ProPublicas story last fall, and the hospital did not answer questions about her care when asked about it again for this story. A spokesperson from Methodist Hospital said its OB-GYNs follow ACOGs miscarriage diagnosis guidelines, which recommend considering clinical factors in addition to ultrasounds. Visit After VisitEven in circumstances in which the abortion ban allows a doctor to intervene to treat a life-threatening emergency, for example, or to remove a dead, unborn baby theres plenty of evidence, detailed in lawsuits and federal investigations, that doctors in Texas still arent offering procedures. As soon as Sarah De Pablos Velez, a 30-year-old media director, learned she was pregnant last summer, she began attending regular checkups at St. Davids Womens Care, in Austin. During her third appointment at about nine weeks, a resident, Dr. Carla Vilardo, and her supervisor, Dr. Cynthia Mingea, reviewed the ultrasound, according to medical records, which indicated her pregnancy wasnt viable. Instead of being offered treatment for a miscarriage, De Pablos Velez says she was advised to hold out hope and come back for the next checkup. Five maternal health experts and practicing OB-GYNs who reviewed the records for ProPublica said by that ultrasound visit, doctors would have had enough information to determine that the pregnancy wasnt viable, even under the most conservative guidelines. If they wanted to be extra sure, they could have done blood work or one more ultrasound during that visit. Instead, De Pablos Velez was told to come back in two weeks, according to medical records. During a visit when she should have been nearly 11 weeks pregnant, Mingea wrote in her chart she was not optimistic about the pregnancy's viability. Still, De Pablos Velez was advised to return in another week to be sure. Within a few days, when the cramping got so bad she could barely walk, De Pablos Velez went to the emergency room at St. Davids Medical Center, unaware that a D&C could stop the pain and the bleeding. Ive never researched what it looks like for women who have a miscarriage, she told ProPublica. I always thought you go to the bathroom and have a little bit of blood.Over two visits to the emergency room, doctors told her that she could complete the miscarriage at home, even as she reported filling up three toilet bowls with blood and a nurse remarked that they needed a janitor to clean the floor, De Pablos Velez and her husband recalled. No obstetrician ever came to assess her condition, according to medical records, and while her hospital chart says all management options have been discussed with the patient and her husband, De Pablos Velez and her husband both told ProPublica no one offered her a D&C. She was told to follow up with her OB at her next appointment in three days. Six hours after discharge, though, she was trying to ride out the pain at home when her husband heard her muttering lightheaded in the bathroom and ran to her in time to catch her as she collapsed. She was pale as a ghost, sweating, convulsing, said her husband, Sergio De Pablos Velez. There was blood on the toilet, the trash can like a scene out of a horror movie. An ambulance rushed her to the hospital, where doctors realized she no longer had enough blood flowing to her organs. She received two blood transfusions. Without them, several doctors who reviewed her records told ProPublica, she would have soon lost her life. De Pablos Velez and her husband, Sergio, at home in Austin (Ilana Panich-Linsman for ProPublica) Vilardo and the doctors who saw De Pablos Velez in the emergency room did not respond to requests to speak with ProPublica or declined to be interviewed. St. Davids Medical Center, which is owned by HCA, the largest for-profit hospital chain in America, said it could not discuss her case unless she signed privacy waivers. The hospital did not respond to ProPublicas questions even after she submitted them. The De Pablos Velezes say that a hospital patient liaison told them after the ordeal that the hospital would conduct an internal investigation, educate the emergency department on best practices and share the results. It never shared anything. When ProPublica asked about the status of the investigation, neither the liaison nor the hospital responded. Mingea, who supervised Vilardos care during checkups, reviewed the clinics records with ProPublica and agreed that De Pablos Velez should have been counseled about miscarriage management options at the clinic, weeks before she ended up in the ER. She said she did not know why she wasnt but pointed ProPublica to the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound criteria, which is hanging on the clinics wall and is used to teach residents. She was adamant that her clinic, which she described as very pro-choice about as much as we can be in Texas, regularly provides D&Cs for miscarrying patients. I feel badly that Sarah had this experience, I really do, she said. Everybody deserves to be counseled about all their options. Doctors had five opportunities to counsel De Pablos Velez about her options and offer her a D&C, said Dr. Jodi Abbott, an associate professor of obstetrics and gynecology at Boston University School of Medicine, who reviewed case records. If they had, the life-or-death risks could have been avoided.De Pablos Velez basically received the same care Porsha Ngumezi did, only Porsha died and she survived, said Abbott. She was lucky. Sophie Chou contributed data reporting, and Mariam Elba contributed research.

by Andrea Suozzo, Kavitha Surana and Lizzie Presser ProPublica is a nonprofit newsroom that investigates abuses of power. Sign up to receive our biggest stories as soon as theyre published. Even though about a million women a year experience a miscarriage, there is little research on complications related to pregnancy loss in the first trimester, when most miscarriages happen. The need to explore this phase is urgent, experts told ProPublica, given the way state abortion bans have disrupted maternal health care. Although most early miscarriages resolve without complications, patients with heavy bleeding can hemorrhage if they dont get appropriate treatment which includes a procedure called dilation and curettage, or D&C, that is now tangled up in legislation that bans abortion. As women recounted being left to lose dangerous amounts of blood, and ProPublica told the story of a mother who died in a Houston hospital while seeking miscarriage care, reporters searched for a way to gain a broader understanding of what was happening in the state. We consulted dozens of researchers and clinicians to develop our methodology and understand how to look at early miscarriage outcomes in the emergency department.Our latest analysis, of hospital discharge data from Texas, found that after the state made performing abortions a felony in August 2022, the number of blood transfusions during emergency room visits for first-trimester miscarriage shot up by 54%.The number of emergency room visits during first-trimester miscarriage also rose by 25%, a sign that women may be returning to hospitals in worse condition after being sent home, more than a dozen experts told ProPublica.Experts say the spike is a troubling indicator of delays in care. The most effective way to prevent severe blood loss during miscarriages, experts said, is a D&C, which uses suction to remove remaining tissue, allowing the uterus to close. The procedure is also used to terminate pregnancies.Dr. Elliott Main, an expert on maternal hemorrhage and the former medical director for the California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative, said the increase in transfusions suggested to him that doctors working under abortion bans are now delaying those interventions for miscarrying patients for longer until theyre really bleeding. These findings add to ProPublicas growing body of reporting revealing that maternal outcomes have gotten worse after the states abortion bans. In February, we published an analysis of second-trimester pregnancy loss hospitalizations, which found that the rate of sepsis climbed by more than 50% after the state banned abortion. That study focused only on inpatient stays in Texas hospitals. However, many of the clinicians and researchers we spoke with told us that that focus would limit what we could say about miscarriage care earlier in pregnancy; most people experiencing first-trimester pregnancy complications would likely be seen in a shorter emergency department visit, rather than an inpatient stay.This methodology lays out the steps we took to examine early miscarriage outcomes in the emergency department, to help experts and interested readers understand our approach and its limitations.Identifying First-Trimester Emergency VisitsWe purchased seven years of discharge records for inpatient and outpatient encounters at hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers from the Texas Department of State Health Services. These records contain deidentified data for visits, with information about the encounter, including diagnoses recorded and procedures performed, as well as some patient demographic information and billing data.We limited our analysis to visits with a diagnosed pregnancy loss across both the inpatient and outpatient datasets. We followed a methodology that maternal health researchers have used for many years to identify abortive outcomes instances of pregnancy loss at less than 20 weeks, which includes diagnoses like ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage. Researchers have typically identified these cases in order to exclude them from metrics assessing complications in childbirth. In contrast, we focused our analysis only on those encounters with a pregnancy loss diagnosis. Medical experts suggested that it's possible more women are self-managing abortions at home; since a self-managed medication abortion would present like a spontaneous miscarriage, however, we cant differentiate those patients in our data.We also limited our analysis to either emergency department visits or inpatient stays that began in the emergency department. The states outpatient data also includes encounters for outpatient procedures and data for ambulatory surgery centers, which we excluded to focus on emergent hospital care. Ultimately, our analysis focused on 35,500 first-trimester visits per year that came into hospitals through the emergency department, excluding a small number (about 1,400 per year) of inpatient stays that did not begin in the emergency room. To limit our analysis to pregnancy loss in the first trimester, we looked for a diagnosis code indicating gestational weeks. In cases where a long hospitalization had multiple gestational week codes recorded over the course of the stay, we took the latest one. We excluded any row that had a gestational week code of 13 weeks or more, which marks the start of the second trimester. The vast majority 78% of emergency department visits for pregnancy loss had a code indicating unknown gestational week or no gestational week diagnosis code at all. We included those visits in the first-trimester category. Clinicians told us that a pregnant patient coming to the emergency department in her first trimester is less likely to have had a doctors appointment establishing gestational age. Since pregnancy loss in the second or third trimester is more serious, and because it is easier to establish gestational age in a pregnancy that is further along, an emergency department doctor would likely be able to establish a gestational age over the course of treatment in those cases.We then filtered our list of visits to ones where the patient was female and between the ages of 10 and 54, to exclude rows with potential errors. This removed 2,692 visits, or 1.1% of all visits wed identified.The number of emergency department first-trimester hospitalizations were relatively stable prior to COVID-19. In 2022, the first full year after the state passed its six-week abortion ban, the number of encounters jumped by 11%. And in 2023, the year after the state criminalized abortion, they rose again, increasing by 25% from pre-COVID levels. While we could identify an increase in visits, we could not identify patients across visits, which means we cant say how many of these visits represent the same person returning to the emergency department multiple times for the same pregnancy loss. Texas has seen an increase in live births since the state banned abortion about 2.7% in 2022, compared with the pre-COVID average, and declining slightly in 2023. But this increase in births and, by extension, pregnancies does not explain the rate of change in emergency visits, which far surpasses it.Clinicians also told us that the threshold for diagnosing pregnancy loss increased after the state banned abortion. To assess how many relevant visits our analysis might be leaving out, and whether we were missing more visits after hospital policy changes, we looked for visits without a pregnancy loss code but with a diagnosis of threatened abortion or early pregnancy hemorrhage, indicating uterine cramping or bleeding in early pregnancy. Since clinicians told us that these diagnoses might range from light spotting to significant bleeding, and since bleeding in pregnancy is common and does not always indicate a miscarriage in progress, we did not include these visits in our main analysis. However, we also identified a 23% increase in visits with those codes from an annual average of 70,936 prior to COVID to 87,431 in 2023.Identifying TransfusionsNext, we identified pregnancy loss visits with a transfusion, which typically indicates that there has been a dangerous loss of blood.For our inpatient dataset, where procedures performed during a hospitalization were recorded as ICD-10-PCS codes, we identified visits with a blood transfusion using a list of codes defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The outpatient dataset, which uses Current Procedural Terminology codes, has just one code 36430 for blood transfusions.Prior to COVID-19, there were 840 first-trimester pregnancy loss emergency department visits each year, on average, with a blood transfusion. In 2022, the first full year after the state passed its first abortion ban, transfusions climbed to 1,076 an increase of 28% from pre-COVID years. By 2023, the first full year after abortion was criminalized, that number climbed to 1,290 an increase of 54% compared to pre-COVID. Thats 450 more visits with a blood transfusion in 2023 than the pre-COVID average. Blood Transfusions in First-trimester Pregnancy Loss ER Visits Spiked After Texas Banned Abortion After the states first abortion ban went into effect in September 2021, blood transfusions increased. After abortion became a felony in August 2022, they increased more. Note: For emergency department visits involving a pregnancy loss at less than 13 weeks gestation, or with an unknown gestational week. Even as the number of visits to the emergency department increased, the proportion of those visits with a transfusion also went up, from 2.5% in pre-COVID years to 2.8% in 2022 and 3% in 2023 suggesting that the increase in transfusions may not be explained by an increase in encounters alone.Experts who reviewed ProPublicas data wondered if the increase in transfusions might be driven by more women experiencing complications of ectopic or molar pregnancies, rare nonviable pregnancies in which the likelihood of a blood transfusion is much higher than for a spontaneous miscarriage. The data did not bear this out. When we excluded visits with ectopic and molar pregnancy diagnoses, the increase in the number of pregnancy loss transfusions was even higher it rose by 61% by 2023.To understand whether there were increases in the numbers of transfusions in other maternal visits over the same time period, we also looked at blood transfusions in delivery events, using the federal methodology to identify birth complications. In hospital births, the number of transfusions increased by 6.7% in 2022 and 9.9% in 2023 compared with the pre-COVID average an increase, but smaller in magnitude than the increase in first-trimester pregnancy loss hospitalizations. Sophie Chou contributed data reporting.

And so will many voters.

When I was a teenager, a mostly forgotten series of novels taught me U.S. history. How would they read to me now?

Nature, Published online: 01 July 2025; doi:10.1038/d41586-025-02016-9The decades-old limit on how long human embryos can be grown in culture is under debate. A new road map outlines how to extend the length of culture responsibly.

Nature, Published online: 01 July 2025; doi:10.1038/d41586-025-02086-9Images hold clues to risk of dementia and various age-related diseases.

Nature, Published online: 01 July 2025; doi:10.1038/d41586-025-02076-xProtect Irans scientists from attacks

Nature, Published online: 01 July 2025; doi:10.1038/d41586-025-02078-9Global pandemic agreement needs sustained pressure to succeed

Nature, Published online: 01 July 2025; doi:10.1038/d41586-025-02077-wHuman space travel risks contaminating Mars

Zlatan Ibrahimovic defended Lionel Messi following Inter Miami's elimination from the FIFA Club World Cup and likened the superstar's teammates to "statues."

by Jessica Lussenhop, and photography by Sarahbeth Maney ProPublica is a nonprofit newsroom that investigates abuses of power. Sign up for Dispatches, a newsletter that spotlights wrongdoing around the country, to receive our stories in your inbox every week. In court, Dr. Nancy Harper comes across as professional and authoritative. Often she begins her testimony by explaining her subspeciality: child abuse pediatrics, which focuses on the diagnosis and documentation of signs of child abuse. Her role, she often reminds judges and juries, is solely medical. Whether or not to remove a child from their home, terminate the parents rights or, in the most serious cases, charge a caregiver criminally is not up to her.According to Harpers testimony, she and her team at the Otto Bremer Trust Center for Safe and Healthy Children in Minneapolis handle about 700 cases of suspected abuse each year. She has testified that 10% to 20% of those wind up confirmed for physical abuse, although it is difficult to determine if these figures are accurate since child protection cases are not public.When Harper, the centers director, and her team diagnose abuse, parents and caregivers often struggle to challenge those opinions. By Harpers own estimation, shes never been wrong.I dont think Ive ever had a case where I thought it was abusive head trauma and the other specialist didnt, Harper testified in 2023, in the case of a day care provider charged with the death of a child in her care.The defense attorney in the case pressed her: Have you ever incorrectly diagnosed a child with abusive head trauma?Not currently to my recollection, she answered.But in a handful of cases, judges and juries have found day care providers and parents not guilty of crimes after Harper has testified that abuse occurred, though a verdict cannot necessarily be interpreted as a repudiation of Harper or any other expert witness determinations or credibility. Additionally, two federal lawsuits filed recently accuse Harper of ignoring or even concealing alternative explanations for childrens injuries. And, more broadly, medical and legal experts are increasingly questioning a leading child abuse diagnosis, shaken baby syndrome, which is also known as abusive head trauma. Harper did not respond to requests for comment. She has yet to respond to either lawsuit. In past court testimony, Harper has said that both shaken baby syndrome and abusive head trauma are considered scientifically valid diagnoses by the mainstream medical community. Any controversy, she has said, exists primarily in the legal world rather than the medical one.Kathleen Pakes, a former prosecutor who now specializes in the forensics of child abuse cases for the Office of the Wisconsin State Public Defender, said Harpers claim of never making an incorrect diagnosis strains credulity.There is no other specialty in medicine that has zero error rate. None, she said.Below are four cases in which Harper concluded there was abuse but courts or juries determined otherwise.On July 12, 2017, an 11-month-old boy named Gabriel Cooper collapsed in his high chair at the day care that Sylwia Pawlak-Reynolds operated in South Minneapolis. Paramedics took him to Hennepin County Medical Center, where he was declared brain dead a day later.Harper reviewed Coopers medical records and wrote that in the absence of a well-documented consistent severe accidental injury, non-accidental trauma or abusive head trauma remains the primary diagnostic consideration. The child, she wrote, was essentially shaken to death. Before any criminal charges were filed, Pawlak-Reynolds boarded a plane for her native Poland to care for her ailing father, according to her attorney. In February 2018, prosecutors charged Pawlak-Reynolds with two counts of second-degree murder, citing Harpers diagnosis.According to her husband, Will Reynolds, they did not realize Pawlak-Reynolds was pregnant when she boarded her flight to Poland. She remained there to give birth to their third child, who is now 6, while Reynolds remained in Minnesota with their two older children, who are now 13 and 16. Reynolds said he and his wife have no confidence that she will get a fair trial, and that she fears she will lose custody of their youngest child if she reenters the country. The family has now been separated for eight years. Sylwia Pawlak-Reynolds husband, Will Reynolds, remains in Minnesota with their two older children. Early in the case, Pawlak-Reynolds attorneys obtained the same copy of Coopers hospital records that had been provided to Minneapolis police, which included the paramedics report. The document had been printed out at a significantly reduced scale, shrinking the text to the point that some fields were illegible. Two years later, they obtained a second copy, printed at normal size, which revealed a possible alternate explanation for the injuries: Mom recalls [patient] did fall 2 days ago, striking the back of his head.That was the sort of proverbial silver-bullet evidence that were always looking for in every case and usually never find, said Brock Hunter, Pawlak-Reynolds lawyer.Polish courts, including an appeals court, have denied extradition requests from the U.S. three times, and the countrys minister of justice has affirmed the rulings. The denials are particularly critical of Harpers assessment. Polish forensic experts evaluated the case records and took note of a finding by a neurology expert hired by Pawlak-Reynolds, who wrote that Cooper carried a gene tied to a blood clotting disorder.The ambulance report, the Polish judges wrote, was concealed from the defense.Then, after the fact was made public, it did not affect the actions of the American authorities in any way, a Polish district court judge wrote in 2022. Hennepin Country Medical Center The Hennepin County Medical Examiners Office certified Coopers manner of death as undetermined and the date and place of injury unknown, a tacit disagreement with Harpers opinion that Cooper would have collapsed shortly after infliction of the trauma.The Hennepin County Medical Examiners Office declined to comment.Then in 2023, Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty wrote to Pawlak-Reynolds attorneys after meeting with them: We agree that to resolve the current impasse regarding Ms. Pawlak-Reynolds, the best course for all involved is to dismiss the pending charges without prejudice, and for her to return to the United States.But months later, Moriarty changed her mind.In a statement to ProPublica, a spokesperson for the Hennepin County Attorneys Office wrote that the office is completing a final, thorough review of the case that will include an evaluation of concerns regarding the medical conclusions and the overall strength of the case.Gabriels parents, Joseph and Samantha Cooper, did not respond to requests for comment. In a television interview in June, they denied that Cooper struck the back of his head two days before his collapse. They said that they want justice for their son.Pawlak-Reynolds declined to comment through her attorney. In late February, her husband filed a federal lawsuit against Harper that claims she knowingly and intentionally falsified, modified and erased exculpatory information from her evaluation of Cooper, and she diagnosed abusive head trauma to promote her own personal, academic, reputational and financial needs.Harper has yet to respond to the lawsuit. A spokesperson for Hennepin Healthcare, which operates Hennepin County Medical Center, declined to comment on the case or the lawsuit.There is no oversight, Reynolds said. Its the thing theyre most resistant against and the thing that is most necessary to stop this legacy of brutality, that results in kids being taken away from innocent caregivers and innocent caregivers going to prison. An old photograph shows Pawlak-Reynolds and one of her children In August 2017, Kathryn Campbell called 911 after a 4-month-old girl at her day care seemed lethargic and was breathing wrong. First responders did not take the baby to the hospital, but her mother eventually did. At the hospital, MRI scans showed fluid in the babys brain and doctors noted small bruises.Dr. Barbara Knox, a child abuse pediatrician then with the University of Wisconsin, told police it was obvious child abuse. The Dane County district attorney charged Campbell with physical abuse of a child. Campbell pleaded not guilty.But before the 2021 trial, Knox left the University of Wisconsin after she was placed on leave for unprofessional acts that may constitute retaliation and intimidation of her own staff. A Wisconsin Watch investigation cast doubt on Knoxs judgment in several cases of alleged abuse.Knox did not respond to the Wisconsin Watch series or to ProPublicas requests for comment. After two families in Alaska sued her in 2022, alleging she had wrongly concluded their children had been abused, Knox wrote in an affidavit that she has no control over whether police and child protection services workers take children away from parents, that she did not conspire with police or anyone else on custody issues, and that she did not personally evaluate one of the children. The lawsuit was dismissed in 2024 after the families agreed to drop the matter.Knox moved on to a job at the University of Florida. According to a spokesperson for the university, Knox resigned as a pediatrician with the Child Protective Team in late June, effective Aug. 15. He declined to comment on the circumstances.At Campbells trial, Knoxs name was never mentioned. Instead, Harper stepped in as an expert witness. When Campbell heard Knox had been replaced, she was initially hopeful.Im like, oh, great, new eyes, Campbell said. Theyre going to look at it and go, This is nuts, I dont agree with this. And I definitely was wrong.Harpers assessment affirmed Knoxs diagnosis of abuse. She told the jury that the bruises were likely caused by squeezing by an adults hand. A medical expert hired by Campbells defense argued that the childs bleeding could not be precisely dated and that a preexisting medical condition could have caused it.After just two hours of deliberation, the jury returned a not guilty verdict. Campbell said she is grateful to have the case concluded, though she said she is still haunted by the accusations against her.That was the hardest thing too, going home after this case was done, and being like, Am I allowed to be alone with my children now? she said. Its all because of the quote-unquote experts not doing their due diligence and looking further into underlying issues that these kids could have.In a statement to ProPublica, Dane County District Attorney Ismael Ozanne expressed confidence in both Harper and Knox, saying their testimony had been consistent with many different medical professionals and experts in their own areas of practice.It is important to note that a not guilty verdict by lay jurors hardly invalidates the widespread acceptance of abusive head trauma as a diagnosis in the medical community nor would it cause us to have concerns about Dr. Harpers qualifications or knowledge in the field, he added. Jurors are not bound to accept any expert testimony as accurate.In the winter of 2022, a 4-month-old boy began breathing abnormally at his day care in Mineral Point, Wisconsin. His parents took him to a hospital, where he died days later. A police investigation determined that his day care provider, Joanna Ford, left him and several other children alone in her home for over an hour while she went to a tattoo and piercing parlor.Prosecutors used Harper as an expert witness in the case. After evaluating the childs medical records, she concluded that his injuries were clinically diagnostic of abusive head trauma, or, put another way, Ford shook the baby violently. She was charged with first-degree reckless homicide. Ford pleaded not guilty.Fords defense lawyers successfully petitioned the judge in the case for a hearing to determine whether Harpers expert witness testimony would be scientifically valid and admissible at trial. In response to questions, Harper explained why the childs symptoms brain swelling, blood under his skull, damage to his eyes pointed to abuse, and why, despite the controversy surrounding it, the diagnosis of abusive head trauma was scientifically sound. She also explained that, because the baby was not walking or crawling, the fact that none of his caregivers could explain his injuries indicated abuse.People should know what happened, she testified.On cross examination by Fords lawyers, Harper said she couldnt say for certain what time the abuse would have occurred, exactly how Ford had injured the baby and that there are no great biomechanical models for shaken baby syndrome.A little over a month later, Judge Lisa McDougal delivered a highly critical ruling that barred Harper from telling the jury that the child died as the result of abusive head trauma, non-accidental injury, child abuse or murder. She also took issue with the idea that a lack of explanation for injuries is indicative of abuse, calling it a leap in logic.Offering a conclusive opinion as to how an injury may have occurred crosses a line and does not fit within the dictionary definition of what diagnosis is, McDougal said. The judge also said that Harper views herself as an advocate, and that that casts doubt on her fidelity to the scientific validation of abusive head trauma diagnoses, especially when it is a close call.The murder charge was dismissed. For leaving the children alone, Ford pleaded guilty to the lesser charge of neglect of a child where the consequence is death. She is serving a 10-year prison sentence. Ford, through her attorney, declined a request for an interview. The Iowa County district attorney also declined to comment.On Feb. 4, 2022, Paul and Sarah Marshall hosted a dinner for her parents and a family friend at their home in Hudson, Wisconsin. Afterward, their 7-week-old son, Fox, became fussy. Paul Marshall carried him into the mother-in-law unit on the lower level of the house, which was cool and dark, to try to calm him. He emerged minutes later in a panic, yelling that the baby spit up and stopped breathing.Paramedics rushed Fox to Childrens Minnesota, a hospital about 25 minutes across the state border in St. Paul. Doctors ran tests, and a scan showed Fox had a skull fracture with fluid pooling on both sides of his brain. He died days later. Harper examined Fox, as well as his twin sister, Liana, and found skull fractures, likely rib fractures, metaphyseal fractures.This constellation of findings in a nonambulatory infant is clinically diagnostic of inflicted injury or child physical abuse likely occurring on more than one occasion, she wrote.But the Marshalls said that wasnt true. They told Harper that Sarah Marshall had experienced a difficult pregnancy with gestational diabetes and severe anemia, and that Liana had a vacuum-assisted delivery. Both twins had been to their regular pediatrician over health concerns. While Lianas health improved, Foxs had not.A spokesperson for Childrens Minnesota declined to comment on the case.Because he was the last person alone with Fox before he stopped breathing, Paul Marshall was charged with first-degree reckless homicide. He was also charged with physical abuse of a child for hurting Liana. Sarah Marshall said there was no evidence that her soft-spoken husband had hurt their children.The state wanted to cast me as a naive idiot, she said. I chose not to believe it because of the logic and facts in my face. I had no reason to believe the accusation.At Paul Marshalls 2023 trial, his defense lawyer, Aaron Nelson, cross-examined the other doctors who treated or evaluated Fox and Liana, and was able to highlight points of medical disagreement. A doctor who tested Liana for genetic disorders said she could not rule out rickets as a possible cause of her bone fractures. A neuropathologist did not agree with Harper that Fox had a trauma-induced blood clotting disorder. By Harpers own admission on cross-examination, determining the age of the skull fractures in children Fox and Lianas age was difficult. Nelson called six of his own medical experts to suggest that the difficult birth or a vitamin deficiency could explain the twins injuries.How many people have to be wrong for Dr. Harper to be right? Nelson said in closing arguments.After an 11-day trial, the jury found Marshall not guilty.In a statement to ProPublica, St. Croix County District Attorney Karl Anderson pointed out that Harper was not the only treating physician who was concerned that Fox and Liana had been abused.A not guilty verdict does not mean that the jury concluded that the children were not abused, Anderson said. Rather, it means that they did not conclude that the State proved that Paul Marshall caused the death, beyond a reasonable doubt. Paul and Sarah Marshall with their children at home, which is decorated with memories of their son, Fox Six weeks after the trial, the family moved three hours away into a century-old farmhouse that is far from the community that they felt wrongfully villainized by.One of the cruelest impacts of the abuse diagnosis, they said, came after it was clear that Fox would die and the hospital staff began making preparations for his organs to be donated. Sarah Marshall said she had hoped to someday hear her sons heart beating in another childs chest. Instead, a court order put a halt to the procedure.They were already treating him as evidence, she said.The experience of going from a grieving parent to an accused murderer, her husband said, has given the couple post-traumatic stress. Paul Marshall said he is grateful to be with his wife and children, but what he calls a broken system has left them unsure whether or not to have another baby or even be left alone with one of their daughters.You get pregnant. You go to all of your appointments. You voice all of your concerns. You do everything youre supposed to do as a parent and your child still dies. And the state tells you its your fault, Sarah Marshall said. I dont understand why I live in a world like that. Mariam Elba contributed research.

The former White House chief strategist speaks about the threats he sees to the political movement that formed around Donald J. Trump.

The tech companys customers can automatically block A.I. companies from exploiting their websites, it said, as it moves to protect original content online.

Plus, three new teams for the WNBA.

After losing to Ted Cruz last year, Mr. Allred is planning his second statewide run and looking for a stronger political climate for Democrats.

A popular former Democratic governor, Roy Cooper, is expected to announce a bid this summer. The Republicans are banking on an endorsement by President Trump to clear their field.

Photo by Gage Skidmore. Design by Sam Donndelinger.Subscribe nowSenior White House adviser and Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller has played a central role in shaping policies in both Trump administrations. He had a key role in the first Muslim travel ban, the first trans military ban and various initiatives to erode the rights of trans students. In Trump 2.0, Miller has either written or edited all of the more than 160 executive orders the president has signed so far.In 2021, Millerwho is not a lawyerfounded America First Legal (AFL), a right-wing organization designed to fight the so-called "woke agenda" in courtrooms across the U.S. AFLs goal is to function as a legal battering ram against Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives, LGBTQ rights, reproductive rights and immigration. The group has rapidly become a key player in the broader conservative movement, launching over a hundred lawsuits, complaints and Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests to serve as the Trump administration's legal attack dog. AFL actively forum shops, filing lawsuits in spaces where judges have shown conservative leanings.Here are the key moves AFL has made on LGBTQ issues.April 6, 2021 Miller launches AFL. In a statement, he describes his vision for the organization:America First Legal is the long-awaited answer to the ACLU. We are committed to an unwavering defense of true equality under law, national borders and sovereignty, freedom of speech and religion, classical values and virtues, the sanctity of life and centrality of family, and our timeless legal and constitutional heritage. Through relentless litigation and oversight we will protect America First, Last, and Always.Aug. 25, 2021AFL files a lawsuit on behalf of two Texas doctors against Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) Xavier Becerra. The doctors object to an HHS notice that states that a law that bars sex discrimination in federally-funded health care also protects LGBTQ people from discrimination. The doctors say that this could pressure them to administer or refer patients to gender-affirming treatments they oppose. In December 2024, the case is thrown out due to lack of standing.Photo by Gage Skidmore.Subscribe nowJune 30, 2022 AFL files a formal civil rights complaint against Morgan Stanley, claiming the companys Freshman Enhancement Program, which aimed to help minorities overcome systemic barriers of entry into the financial field, was racist and sexist against white men. Morgan Stanley would quietly shutter the program in 2024.July 2022 A month after Roe v. Wade is overturned, AFL files civil rights complaints against Dicks Sporting Goods and Lyft for company policies that help employees pay for travel expenses related to out-of-state abortions.Oct. 26, 2022 In the lead up to the midterm elections, AFL sends out mailers to Spanish-speaking voters that accuse Joe Biden and his allies on the left of indoctrinating your children, and [i]njecting young children with female hormones given to sex offenders to cause sterilization. The mailers also include an altered photo of Dr. Rachel Levine, falsely writing that she promotes the chemical and surgical castration of boys and girls.Photo by Denver Post.Jan. 25, 2023 AFL sues the West Shore School District of Pennsylvania, alleging their Social Emotional Learning curriculum violates parents rights to their childrens moral and religious education because there was no option to opt out. AFL took particular issue with the curriculum's virtues and values. The court would side with AFL.April 2023 AFL files a federal civil rights complaint against Anheuser-Busch and requests that an investigation take place for their hiring, promoting and job-training employment practices. The complaint is filed in part because of a recent Bud Light marketing campaign that featured transgender actress and influencer Dylan Mulvaney. AFL would file nearly identical complaints against McDonald's, BlackRock and Mars.Photo by w_lemay.April 21, 2023 AFL is listed on the advisory board for Project 2025the 920-page policy blueprint that recommends overturning a variety of LGBTQ rights. Miller later has AFL removed because of negative attention.May-August 2023 AFL files a barrage of lawsuits, complaints and FOIA requests against a litany of companies, including Microsoft, Unilever, Nordstrom, PricewaterhouseCoopers and Kelloggs for their DEI initiatives. In a FOIA request, they claim Microsoft purposefully laid off natural-born citizens in favor of hiring foreign workers who they can pay a lower wage. For the complaint against Unilever, they took issue with the language in their application process that says, Where legally possible, we consider racial and ethnic diversity in our recruitment.Sept. 6, 2023 AFL sues the Association of Independent Commercial Producers (AICP) on behalf of a white man who alleges he was forced to report to an inexperienced Black employee as a result of AICPs Double the Line program. AFL claims that the program, which aimed to help people of color overcome barriers of entry in the entertainment industry, is racist toward white people. In a statement, AFL wrote:For many decades, New York and Federal law have prohibited discrimination based on race, color, national origin, and sex. The Defendants, with their morally twisted woke view that racism, bigotry, and sexism actually are perfectly fine have arrogantly declared themselves above the law. The Defendants here, and the entertainment industry more generally, will soon find out that the cost of racialist virtue signaling has gone up.Oct. 5, 2023 AFL files a federal civil rights complaint against the MLBs diversity programs, claiming these policies unlawfully favor women and Black and Brown people.In March 2025, the MLB removes all mentions of diversity from their website and releases a statement saying: We are in the process of evaluating our programs for any modifications to eligibility criteria that are needed to ensure our programs are compliant with federal law as they continue forward.While the MLB did not cite the complaint, some speculated that the league may have bowed to AFL and Trumps demands to avoid having their antitrust legal exemption revoked.AFL would later hit other sporting leagues with similar complaints, including the NFL and NASCAR.Oct. 19, 2023 AFL sues New York University on behalf of a first-year law student, who baselessly claims the university discriminates against white men when selecting members and editors for the Law Review. Law review editors take heed. Any subordination of academic merit to diversity considerations when selecting members or articles will be met with a lawsuit, AFL says in a statement.Nov. 1, 2023 AFL files federal civil rights complaints against American Airlines, Southwest Airlines and United Airlines for corporate DEI initiatives that aim to promote minorities so that company leadership is more representative of their customers. A year later, all three airlines would ground their DEI hiring practices.Nov. 20, 2023 AFL sues Mesa Public Schools and their superintendent, alleging that teachers and administrators are encouraging and assisting students to identify as members of the opposite sex without notifying parents and helping with the facilitation of sex transition. Legal advisers concluded the districts policies comply with state law, and leadership says no medical transition is involved whatsoever.Dec. 19, 2023 Just in time for the holidays, AFL files federal civil rights complaints against Mattel and Hasbro for their DEI practices that are promoting a radical LGBT+ agenda. Americas biggest toy companies had sought diverse leadership through their DEI initiatives that helped gender, racial and sexual minorities overcome systemic barriers in the corporate world. But AFL sees that as unfairly tipping the scales away from white men.Feb. 29, 2024 A script coordinator files a lawsuit with AFL against CBS/Paramount, alleging he was blocked from advancing at the company due to their DEI quotas. The lawsuit accuses the network of discriminating against straight white men. After a year, CBS and Paramount would settle by dismantling diversity hiring targets and pledging to assess future hires on merit.Subscribe nowApril 29, 2024 AFL teams up with Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton to sue the Biden administration over its revised Title IX guidance that bars schools from discriminating against transgender students. Bidens new Title IX regulation is a vile obscenity: it forces women and girls to share locker rooms and restrooms with men. It forces them to call a he, a she, and to pretend in every way that a man is a woman, humiliating, degrading, and erasing women, Miller says in a statement.Photo by Gage Skidmore.June 21, 2024 In a narrow ruling, eight employers that AFL represented in 2021 are no longer legally required to provide no-cost coverage for certain types of preventative care, including PrEP for HIV. This opens the door for larger lawsuits, which paves the way for more employers to claim that covering healthcare that disproportionately affects LGBTQ people could violate their religiously held beliefs, such as the idea that homosexuality is a sin.Sept. 18, 2024 AFL files a lawsuit against California Governor Gavin Newsom for signing a bill into law that makes it harder for schools and educators to disclose a students LGBTQ identity to their parents. The law also allocates funding for services such as counseling for LGBTQ youth and the development of anti-harassment policies in schools.December 2024 AFL files an amicus brief in support of Marlean Ames, a white, straight Ohio woman, who claims she was passed over for two promotions that were given to less qualified gay co-workers and that the bar to prove reverse discrimination is too high. The case was taken to the Supreme Court andin Juneruled in Ames' favor in a unanimous decision.Feb. 12, 2025 AFL sues the Trans-Siberian Orchestra on behalf of Jessica Featherston, a lighting technician who alleges she was removed from the orchestra after reporting a transgender woman for sexual harassment when she was in the womens locker room.ShareFeb. 20, 2025 AFL and Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier sue Target. They allege that the retail giants corporate board put shareholders at unnecessary financial risk due to the loss of profits from DEI initiatives and the impact of LGBTQ activists, which they claim hurts the company's bottom line.Photo by Office of the Attorney General, State of Florida.Feb. 24, 2025 AFL formally requests that the U.S. Department of Labors Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs begin investigating federal contractors who are disobeying Trumps 2025 executive order that aims to end DEI initiatives.If objective, nonpartisan, rigorous, LGBTQ-focused journalism is important to you, please consider making a tax-deductible donation through our fiscal sponsor, Resource Impact, by clicking this button:Donate to Uncloseted Media

Nature, Published online: 01 July 2025; doi:10.1038/d41586-025-01828-zInternational scholars targeted by Trump administration are among those seeking greater protection.

Nature, Published online: 01 July 2025; doi:10.1038/d41586-025-02031-wVirtual chatbots that simulate conversations with famous actors or sci-fi characters can have real-world consequences.

Nature, Published online: 01 July 2025; doi:10.1038/d41586-025-02079-8It should be free to apply to graduate school

Nature, Published online: 01 July 2025; doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09309-zAuthor Correction: Targeting the SHOC2RAS interaction in RAS-mutant cancers

Nature, Published online: 30 June 2025; doi:10.1038/d41586-025-02088-7The US National Institutes of Health is still screening grants in process a judge ruled illegal last week. Plus, one researchers 40-year project to communicate with dolphins and a wake-up call about computer-vision research.

They share a home state, have ex-MLB outfielders for dads -- and took two very different paths to the top of the draft.

by Spencer Norris, New York Focus, and Joel Jacobs, ProPublica, graphics by Lucas Waldron, ProPublica This article was produced for ProPublicas Local Reporting Network in partnership with New York Focus, an investigative news outlet reporting on New York. Sign up for Dispatches to get our stories in your inbox every week, and sign up for New York Focus newsletter here. Hotels have long been considered a last resort for sheltering people whove lost their housing. But over the past few years, theyve become New Yorks predominant response to homelessness outside New York City, a recent investigation by New York Focus and ProPublica found.Social services agencies across the state now place nearly half of all individuals and families seeking shelter in hotels. Yet those placed in hotels often go without services that theyre supposed to receive in shelters, such as meals, help finding housing and sometimes child care so they can look for work.The growing reliance on hotels has been driven by soaring rent, shelter closures and a spike in evictions that followed a moratorium during the COVID-19 pandemic. The state Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance has known about the problem for years and even put rules to address the issue on its regulatory agenda. But the agency has failed to formally propose the rules or come up with a way to ensure people receive services they need.Here are five charts to explain our investigation. Statewide Spending on Hotels More Than Tripled From 2018 to 2024 Data source: Analysis of Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance data on emergency shelter payments. Years are fiscal years. (Lucas Waldron/ProPublica) The number of families and individuals placed in hotels doubled in the two years following the end of New Yorks eviction moratorium in 2022. As the population in hotels shot up, so did the bill. Over that period, spending on hotels outside of New York City more than tripled to $110 million.OTDA oversees the states county-run social services districts. The agencys commissioner, Barbara Guinn, said that it prefers that counties use shelters, but that there arent enough beds for everyone who needs one. She said that the agency hadnt studied the growth in hotel use. Required Services in Shelters vs. Hotels Note: Requirements are for hotels outside of New York City. New York regulations state that hotels can be considered shelters, and thus mandated to provide services. But there arent any that are currently required to do so, Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance spokesperson Anthony Farmer said. Source: New York Codes, Rules and Regulations. Despite the growth in spending, families placed in hotels arent promised the same services as people in shelters. New York requires family shelters to provide services like child care, assistance finding housing and three meals a day. But the regulations generally exempt hotels.Theres an exception: A hotel is supposed to be considered a shelter if it primarily serves temporary housing recipients. OTDA spokesperson Anthony Farmer said that the agency interprets primarily to mean exclusively, or almost exclusively, and that no hotels currently meet that standard. An analysis of the agencys data by New York Focus and ProPublica found that welfare recipients made up over half of the capacity for at least 16 hotels during fiscal year 2024.Guinn said that social services offices have to work within the confines of what hotel owners will allow, and that counties try to provide services off-site. The Number of Individuals and Families Housed in Hotels for More Than Six Months Nearly Tripled From 2022 to 2024 Data Source: Analysis of Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance data on emergency shelter payments. Years are fiscal years. Stays may not be continuous. (Lucas Waldron/ProPublica) Not only are more people being placed in the hotels, but they are staying for much longer periods. The number of families and individuals spending at least six months out of the year in hotels nearly tripled from 2022 to 2024.The lack of services leads to people getting stuck in the system, creating a snowball effect, said Steve Berg, chief policy officer for the National Alliance to End Homelessness.Its this expanding problem, he said. A good shelter should be housing-focused. If they dont have a pretty substantial effort to move people quickly back into housing and provide the services that are necessary to do that, the shelters quickly fill up, and then they just need more shelters.Farmer said via email that a lack of affordable housing contributes to the longer stays, and that counties can use other funding to help people move back into permanent housing. New York Social Services Agencies Frequently Paid Hotels Over Fair Market Rent for a Two-Bedroom Apartment Nearly half of all payments to hotels were for more than twice the counties FMR. Data Source: Analysis of Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance data on emergency shelter payments; U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development fair market rent data for two-bedroom apartments in each county for federal fiscal year 2024. (Lucas Waldron/ProPublica) Many hotels are charging rates higher than rent for permanent housing.The news organizations found that the overwhelming majority of hotel payments exceeded fair market rent for a two-bedroom apartment in the same county. (Fair market rent is defined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development as the 40th percentile of rent plus utilities in the local housing market.) The rates charged were often more than twice that.Were forced to rent hotel rooms across the state, and the operators of these places understand that, said state Sen. Roxanne Persaud, a Democrat and chair of the chambers Social Services Committee. The municipalities backs are against the wall. And so they must place the unhoused person or persons somewhere. And so thats why you see the cost is skyrocketing, because people understand that its an easy way to make money off the government. More Than a Third of Hotels Used to Shelter Homeless People Were Out of Date on Social Services Inspections as of October 2024 Data Source: Analysis of Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance data on inspections of hotels and motels used for emergency shelter. (Lucas Waldron/ProPublica) New York Focus and ProPublica found numerous examples of families with children living in sordid and dangerous conditions. Roaches, mold, broken windows and filthy linens were common. Some hotels were subject to over a hundred emergency calls a year for assaults, robberies, mental health crises, overdoses and other incidents.Hotels sheltering homeless families are supposed to be inspected every six months by their countys social services office. Yet data obtained from OTDA shows that many wind up behind schedule. As of October, about 40% of hotels were either out of date on their inspection or didnt have one listed. Farmer, the OTDA spokesperson, said that nearly all hotels were inspected within a year, and that some had stopped accepting welfare recipients.Guinn, the commissioner, said that OTDA will formally propose rules this year clarifying that people in hotels must receive the same services as they would receive in shelters. She also said her agency will increase oversight of how social services offices are delivering those services.

We take a closer look at some less discussed provisions.

The City Council can block the development of new housing. A panel created by Mayor Eric Adams wants to let voters weigh in on reducing the Councils power.

With developing nations crushed by unaffordable borrowing and Washington on the sidelines, some leaders are brokering debt forgiveness deals.

In her first review as our new critic, Tejal Rao visits Acamaya, where the chef Ana Castro is writing the latest chapter in the citys rich culinary story.

Some wore vestments, others scrubs. Some were on courts, others in court. All have shaped the look of the year.

Nature, Published online: 01 July 2025; doi:10.1038/d41586-025-01829-yBy taking a few technical steps, Ive made my teaching more accessible to my students and to biologists around the world.

Why should you have to wait until all of the Premier League kits are out before you see them ranked? Here's every 2025-26 jersey that's been released.

With the 2026 FIFA World Cup less than a year away, how important is it USMNT players transfer to better clubs or find clubs where they can play more?

We put our experts through the paces of multiple mock drafts to derive the ultimate average draft positions for 2025.

Cal Raleigh hit his 33rd homer to become the fifth player in MLB history to reach that total before July, joining Ken Griffey Jr., Sammy Sosa, Mark McGwire and Barry Bonds.

Italy's Elisabetta Cocciaretto registered the biggest win of her career when she knocked out American Jessica Pegula, the No. 3 seed, in less than an hour at Wimbledon.

With 6,700 refillable water bottles, shade mapping and ice packs, the worlds oldest championship tennis tournament is taking Britains heat wave seriously.

Towns and troops long accustomed to merciless bombardment are adjusting to an even denser pattern of attacks.

Since no candidate received 50 percent of the vote on Primary Day, the Board of Elections proceeded to ranked-choice tabulations, which will be released on Tuesday.