J.K. Rowling took a five second break from her crusade against trans rights to take aim at a different group the stars of Harry Potter.Earlier this week, the controversial author retweeted a post on X that asked a broad question of anyone wanting to interact with it: "What actor/actress instantly ruins a movie for you?""Three guesses," she wrote. "Sorry, but that was irresistible." (@) It doesnt take magic to figure out this is a thinly veiled dig at Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, and Rupert Grint and a predictably childish one, at that. Rowling has previously made it clear that shes fallen out with the three actors due to her dangerous views on trans people. Of course, by her account, its because theyre the ones pushing dangerous views."Celebs who cosied up to a movement intent on eroding womens hard-won rights and who used their platforms to cheer on the transitioning of minors can save their apologies for traumatised detransitioners and vulnerable women reliant on single sex spaces," she wrote on X last year after someone suggested she would "forgive" Radcliffe and Watson for supporting trans rights.Its important to note that, to date, none of the three actors have indicated an interest in "apologizing" for supporting a marginalized community. Additionally, the number of trans people who detransition is extremely small.Rowling clearly thought she was being hilarious in taking another swing at the Harry Potter stars. And her anti-trans crowd who cheers on every bit of hatred she spews certainly agreed. But plenty of other people called her out for just how pathetic this continues to look. (@) "Daniel Radcliffe and Rupert Grint are fathers, Emma Watson is doing a Masters at Oxford, Dan won a Tony last year, Rupert did a critically acclaimed Apple TV series, Emma started a business with her brothermeanwhile youre a weird lady obsessed with peoples genitals, Joanne." (@) "It makes you laugh that anti-trans activists say were the ones forcing our will onto others when they cant handle the fact that three kids who starred in an adaptation of a novel grew up, formed their own opinions and have the agency to not agree with their bigotry." (@) "theres only one reason she wants a new harry potter series, and its because she hates the idea that she had a hand in starting the careers of three incredibly decent people with lives that arent plagued by hatred and have great success despite speaking out against her bigotry" (@) "the children who get cast in the new harry potter show will be forced to sign an ironclad contract promising they will never contradict jk rowling on anything for the rest of their lives" (@) "Theres something deeply weird and creepy at the pathological hatred she has for three adults that she world have met as children and feels betrayed that they dont have the same opinions as her."